Understanding about “Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE): What should we know, what should we do?

On this Page :

Accelerating decarbonization has been focused on our world. Numerous companies deploy their ambitions, direction, etc. about how they do (sometime not do), what they are. Many renewable energy projects have been developed (Nuclear, Wind, Solar, etc.) in different stages frequently measured using indicating things such as TRL combined with feasibility study.

Why is LCOE important?

Roughly comparing energy projects, Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) has been popular for providing the preliminary benchmarking that it is a useful tool for policy makers, investors, and energy companies to evaluate the costs and benefits of different energy sources and methods, which make simply and quickly decisions about the deployment of energy generation technologies.

What is the definition of LCOE and How do we calculate it?

Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is the indicator to measure the average total cost of generating energy from a specific source over total electricity generation over its lifetime.

LCOE = [Net present value (NPV) of total cost of the energy-generating system over lifetime] / [Net present value (NPV) of Total energy produced over the lifetime of the system]

“Net present value (NPV) of total cost of the energy-generating system over lifetime” could be calculated following simple factors:

  • Investment expenditures in year t.
  • Running expenditures (Operation, maintenance, Fuel, etc.) in year t
  • Financing expenditures, including interest, discount rate, etc.
No alt text provided for this image
Levelized Cost of Energy: Calculation example

There are two major LCOE methods are used:

  1. LCOE annuitizing method: suggested by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
  2. LCOE discounting method: suggested by Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy

Some of LCOE Report and Study

No alt text provided for this image
Ref: ““Demystifying the Costs of Electricity Generation Technologies”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 9303. World Bank Washington, DC. “
No alt text provided for this image
Ref:”Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020″

LCOE: Disadvantage

  • Oversimplify: LCOE provides summarized value from a complex set of costs and benefits, we need to detail analysis in different energy sources.
  • Neglect external factors: LCOE does not consider external costs and benefits, such as environmental impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, or the impact on local ecosystems.
  • High uncertainty: LCOE calculations do not include uncertainties that can be changed over time.
  • Different calculation methods: There is no standard method for calculating LCOE, and different organizations may use different methods and assumptions, making it difficult to compare the LCOE of different energy sources.
  • Restrictive scope: LCOE does not consider the cost of energy transmission, distribution, or storage.

Connect with our
Competency
Connect
featured insights
Process Scale-Up
Article
Bridging the Gap – Understand a Key Differences Between a Small Beakers to Larger Sizes.
The journey from a laboratory experiment to a commercially viable process is challenging step i.....
OSVARD
Process Scale-Up
Article
Bridging the Gap – Understand a Key Differences Between a Small Beakers to Larger Sizes.
The journey from a laboratory experiment to a commercially viable process is challenging step i.....
OSVARD
Engineering Design
Article
Why is Ideal flow pattern crucial for upscaling Fixed-bed reactor ?
The challenge in fixed-bed reactor scale up is partial similarity of laboratory, pilot, and commerci
OSVARD
High Performance Culture
Article
How to properly apply inert bed dilution for catalyst testing in fixed-bed reactor
Nowadays, computing systems with extremely high computational power, well-known as High performance
OSVARD
Process Scale-Up
Article
To Make it Perfect: Where Should You Set Up Your Pilot/Demonstration Plant?
In the development of chemical industry, "pilot plant" is frequently used of innovation and expe....
OSVARD
High Performance Culture
Article
How to Conquer the Loop of Death Valley
To ensure the success in catalyst development, the business direction and engineering design must be
OSVARD
Engineering Design
Article
Too Small to be Viable, Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMNRs)
the NuScale project faced a significant cost increase, with the target price for power generatio....
OSVARD
Chemical Technology Development
Article
H2 or kWh – Evaluating the Potential of Hydrogen and Electron Economies in Decarbonization
Hydrogen's potential for decarbonization lies in its versatility. It can be produced from water.....
OSVARD
Engineering Design
Article
Industrial Heat Pumps: Even It is Hard to Implement, But Non-Negotiable.
An industrial heat pump (IHP) is a large-scale device designed to capture and repurpose heat fro....
OSVARD
Engineering Design
Article
Death of Elon Musk’s Hyperloop, The Next is Direct-air Capture (DAC)
Hyperloop One, initially a high-profile venture, raised over $450 million and constructed a sm....
OSVARD
Process Scale-Up
Article
What’s Challenges in Scaling up or down of Single-phase Catalytic Fixed-bed Reactors ?
Fixed-bed reactors is commonly used in commercial-scale. Laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactors might b
OSVARD
Safety Engineering
Article
The Death Valley of Brand-new Technology Development.
In the bottom-up development approach, the multi-stage process starts in the laboratory, moves to th
OSVARD
Chemical Technology Development
Article
Energy Return on Investment (EROI), Issue of Sustainability
EROI measures how much energy we get back from an energy source compared to how much we put in t....